Morad ELUSTA, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CITY OF CHICAGO, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued April 11, 2012.
Decided September 4, 2012.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Joseph T. Gentleman (argued), Attorney, Gentleman Law, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Suzanne M. Loose (argued), Attorney, City of Chicago Law Department, Chicago, IL, for Defendant-Appellee.
David A. Cerda (argued), Attorney, Cerda Law Office, Chicago, IL, pro se.
Zane D. Smith (argued), Attorney, Zane D. Smith & Associates, Ltd., Chicago, IL, pro se.
Sheila Genson, Law Office of Sheila Ann Genson, Ltd., Schaumburg, IL, pro se.
Before WOOD, WILLIAMS, and TINDER, Circuit Judges.
United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
WOOD, Circuit Judge.
This is a case about attorney's fees.1 But it is not the typical attorney's fees case in which an attorney seeks review of a court's award, perhaps arguing about an improperly calculated lodestar. Instead here, a client — Morad Elusta — seeks to compel two of his former attorneys, Zane Smith and Sheila Genson, to turn over some of the fee award to him. Smith...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
