BERRY v. CONYERS

No. 2011-3207.

692 F.3d 1223 (2012)

John BERRY, Director, Office of Personnel Management, Petitioner, v. Rhonda K. CONYERS and Devon Haughton Northover, Respondents, and Merit Systems Protection Board, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

August 17, 2012.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Abby C. Wright , Attorney, Appellate Staff, Commercial Litigation Branch, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for petitioner. With her on the brief were Tony West , Assistant Attorney General, Jeanne E. Davidson , Director, Todd M. Hughes , Deputy Director, Allison Kidd-Miller , Senior Trial Counsel, and Douglas N. Letter , Attorney. Of counsel on the brief were Elaine Kaplan , General Counsel, Kathie A. Whipple , Deputy General Counsel, Steven E. Abow , Assistant General Counsel, Office of the General Counsel, Office of Personnel Management, of Washington, DC.

Andres M. Grajales , American Federation of Government Employees, of Washington, DC, argued for respondents Rhonda K. Conyers and Devon Haughton Northover. With him on the brief were David A. Borer , General Counsel, and Joseph F. Henderson , Deputy General Counsel.

Jeffrey A. Gauger , Attorney, Office of the General Counsel, Merit Systems Protection Board, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent. With him on the brief were James M. Eisenmann , General Counsel, and Keisha Dawn Bell , Deputy General Counsel.

Arthur B. Spitzer , American Civil Liberties Union of the Nation's Capital, of Washington, DC, for amici curiae American Civil Liberties Union of the National Capital Area. With him on the brief were Gregory O'Duden , General Counsel, Larry J. Adkins , Deputy General Counsel, Julie M. Wilson , Associate General Counsel, and Paras N. Shah , Assistant Counsel, National Treasury Employees Union, of Washington, DC.

Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge DYK.


WALLACH, Circuit Judge.

The Director of the Office of Personnel Management ("OPM") seeks review of the decision by the Merit Systems Protection Board ("Board") holding that the Supreme Court's decision in Department of the Navy v. Egan, 484 U.S. 518, 108 S.Ct. 818, 98 L.Ed.2d 918 (1988), limits Board review of an otherwise appealable adverse action only if that action is based upon eligibility for or a denial, revocation, or...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases