1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 696 F.3d
  5. 696 F.3d 966 (2012)
 

GELDER v. COXCOM INC.

No. 12-706.

696 F.3d 966 (2012)

Bradley GELDER; Bobby Bowick; Henry Holmes; Jessica Diket, individually and on behalf of those similarly situated; Sharon Coughlin, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated; Sandra Prezgay; Ron Strobo; Barksdale Hortenstine; Toni Becnel; John Joseph Brady; Robert M. Becnel; Ernest Johnson; Trevor Haynes; Garrett W. Wotkyns; Brittni Cottle-Banks, an individual on behalf of herself and of all others similarly situated, Petitioners, v. COXCOM INC.; Cox Communications, Inc.; Cox Communications New Orleans, Inc.; Cox Communications Louisiana LLC; Cox Nevada Telecom LLC; Cox Communications Las Vegas, Inc.; Cox Communications Holdings, Inc.; Cox Communications EBD Holdings, Inc.; Cox Communications NCC Inc.; Cox Communications Gulf Coast LLC; Cox Nevada Telecom LLC; Elizabeth Ann Brady; Does, 1 through 100, exclusive, Respondents.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

August 8, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael J. Blaschke , Rachel Lawrence Mor , S. Randall Sullivan , A. Daniel Woska , A. Daniel Woska & Associates, P.C., Oklahoma City, OK, Allan Kanner , Cynthia Green St. Amant , Kanner & Whiteley, LLC, New Orleans, LA, Todd Schneider , Adam Wolf , Schneider Wallace Cottrell Brayton & Konecky, LLP, San Francisco, CA, Joe R. Whatley, Jr. , Whatley Drake & Kallas, New York, NY, for Petitioners.

Teresa Anne Arnold-Simmons , Quintairos Prieto Wood PA, Jacksonville, FL, Robert G. Kidwell , Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky & Popeo PC, Washington, DC, Martin E. Landrieu , Gordon, Arata, McCollam & Duplantis, New Orleans, LA, David Kent Meyers, Esq. , Crowe & Dunlevy, Oklahoma City, OK, for Respondents.

Before LUCERO, HARTZ, and O'BRIEN, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This matter is before the court to consider the plaintiffs' petition for permission to appeal the district court's denial of their request for class certification filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(f) and Fed. R.App. P. 5. The petition is denied.1

I

The plaintiffs filed this action against Cox Enterprises, Inc., on behalf of themselves as well...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases