LOUGHLIN v. LING

No. 2011-1432.

684 F.3d 1289 (2012)

Robert LOUGHLIN and John Loughlin, Appellants, v. Renny Tse-Haw LING and Chun-Sheng Wu, Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

July 11, 2012.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Glen M. Diehl , Diehl Servilla LLC, of Iselin, NJ, argued for appellant.

Todd R. Walters , Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney P.C., of Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee. With him on the brief was Erin M. Dunston. Of counsel on the brief was Todd P. Blakely , Sheridan Ross PC, of Denver, CO.

Before RADER, Chief Judge, and LOURIE and MOORE, Circuit Judges.


LOURIE, Circuit Judge.

Robert Loughlin and John Loughlin (together, "Loughlin") appeal from the judgment of the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (the "Board") canceling claim 1 of U.S. Patent 7,434,426 (the "'426 patent") pursuant to their request for adverse judgment in light of the Board's decision on the relationship between 35 U.S.C. § 135(b)(2) and 35 U.S.C. § 120. Because we agree with the Board that the interfering claims of Renny Tse-Haw...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases