1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 678 F.3d
  5. 678 F.3d 797 (2012)
 

STERN v. GAMBELLO

Nos. 10-56929, 10-57062.

678 F.3d 797 (2012)

Heather STERN; Brooke Randolph; John Girard; Martin Schnall; Nathan Riensche; Kelly Lemons, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Marc GAMBELLO; Gene Hopkins, Objectors-Appellants, New Cingular Wireless Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation, fka AT & T Wireless Services, Inc.; AT & T Mobility Corporation, a Delaware corporation, fka Cingular Wireless Corporation; AT & T Mobility LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, fka Cingular Wireless LLC, Defendants-Appellees. Heather Stern, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellee, New Cingular Wireless Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation, fka AT & T Wireless Services, Inc.; AT & T Mobility Corporation, a Delaware corporation, fka Cingular Wireless Corporation; AT & T Mobility LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, fka Cingular Wireless LLC, Defendants-Appellees, v. Karin Lynch, Objector-Appellant, Marc Gambello; Gene Hopkins, Objectors.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

May 4, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Peter James Bezek , Robert Allen Curtis , Foley Bezek Behle & Curtis, LLP, J. Paul Gignac , Arias, Ozzello & Gignac, LLP, Santa Barbara, CA, David Elliot Breskin, Esquire , Daniel Foster Johnson, Esquire , Breskin Johnson & Townsend PLLC, Seattle, WA, William W. Houck , Houck Law Firm PS, Issaquah, WA, Randolph Hunter Pyle , Sundeen Salinas & Pyle, Oakland, CA, for Plaintiffs-Appellees.

Janine R. Menhennet , Darrell Palmer, Law Offices of Darrell Palmer, Solana Beach, CA, Jason Thompson, Esquire , Thompson & Thompson, P.C., San Antonio, TX, for Objectors-Appellants.

Kathleen Balderrama, Esquire , Counsel, Emily Tomoko Kuwahara , Crowell & Moring, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Steven P. Rice, Esquire , Crowell & Moring, LLP, Irvine, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

ORDER

BERZON, Circuit Judge:

After considerable pre-argument preparation, I realized this week that my husband and I appear to be members of the plaintiff class in this case, as we have had AT & T cellular service for some time. I therefore considered whether to recuse from this case. Having researched the question, I have determined that the appropriate course is for me and my husband to forego any financial interest in the settlement before the court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases