1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 679 F.3d
  5. 679 F.3d 1121 (2012)
 

IN RE PACIFIC PICTURES CORP.

No. 11-71844.

679 F.3d 1121 (2012)

In re PACIFIC PICTURES CORPORATION; IP Worldwide, LLC; IPW, LLC; Marc Toberoff; Mark Warren Peary; Laura Siegel Larson; Jean Adele Peavy, Pacific Pictures Corporation; IP Worldwide, LLC; IPW, LLC; Mark Warren Peary, as personal representative of the Estate of Joseph Shuster; Marc Toberoff, an individual; Jean Adele Peavy; Laura Siegel Larson, an individual, Petitioners, v. United States District Court for the Central District of California, Los Angeles, Respondent, D.C. Comics, Real Party in Interest.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed April 17, 2012.

Amended May 10, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard B. Kendall, Kendall Brill & Klieger LLP, Los Angeles, CA, argued the cause and filed the briefs for the petitioners. With him on the briefs were Laura W. Brill, Kendall Brill & Kleiger, LLP, Los Angeles, CA as well as Marc Toberoff and Keith G. Adams, Toberoff & Associates, P.C., Los Angeles, CA.

Matthew T. Kline, O'Melveny & Myers LLP, Los Angeles, CA, argued the cause and filed the brief for the real party in interest. With him on the brief were Daniel M. Petrocelli and Cassandra L. Seto, O'Melveny & Myers LLP as well as Patrick T. Perkins, Perkins Law Office, P.C., Cold Spring, NY.

Before: ALEX KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, DIARMUID F. O'SCANNLAIN and N. RANDY SMITH, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

In the opinion filed in this case on April 17, 2012, we referred to allegations of misconduct made against an attorney by the name of David Michaels. That opinion is hereby amended to reflect that there has been no finding of wrongdoing on the part of Mr. Michaels. The amended opinion is filed concurrently with this order. This order does not affect any petitions for rehearing currently before the court, but no further petitions for rehearing will be accepted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases