1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 675 F.3d
  5. 675 F.3d 1302 (2012)
 

NOAH SYSTEMS, INC. v. INTUIT INC.

No. 2011-1390.

675 F.3d 1302 (2012)

NOAH SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. INTUIT INC., Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

April 9, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Eric G. Soller , Pietragallo Gordon Alfano Bosick & Raspanti, LLP, of Pittsburgh, PA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was Alan G. Towner .

Michael J. Sacksteder , Fenwick & West LLP, of San Francisco, CA, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief was David D. Schumann .

Before RADER Chief Judge, O'MALLEY and REYNA, Circuit Judges.

O'MALLEY, Circuit Judge.

Noah Systems, Inc. ("Noah") appeals the district court's entry of judgment in favor of Intuit Inc. ("Intuit"). After construing the disputed terms of the asserted claims of U.S. Patent No. 5,875,435 ("the '435 patent"), the district court determined that an "access means" limitation in the claims of the '435 patent was indefinite, and, therefore, granted Intuit's Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases