PROMEGA CORP. v. LIFE TECHNOLOGIES CORP.

No. 2011-1263.

674 F.3d 1352 (2012)

PROMEGA CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Max-Planck-Gesellschaft Zur Forderung Der Wissenschaften E.V., Plaintiff, v. LIFE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, Invitrogen IP Holdings, Inc., and Applied Biosystems, LLC, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

March 28, 2012.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James R. Troupis , Troupis Law Office LLC, of Middleton, WI, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was Susan R. Podolsky , of Alexandria, VA.

Kristine E. Johnson , Parsons Behle & Latimer, Salt Lake City, UT, argued for defendants-appellees. With her on the brief was Francis M. Wikstrom . Of counsel on the brief were Amy Sun and Kurtis D. MacFerrin , Life Technologies Corporation, of Carlsbad, CA.

Before RADER, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and DYK, Circuit Judges.


Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge DYK. Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge NEWMAN.

DYK, Circuit Judge.

Promega Corporation ("Promega") appeals a decision of the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin granting Invitrogen IP Holdings, Inc.'s ("IP Holdings") motion to compel arbitration. Promega Corp. v. Life Techs. Corp., No. 10-cv-281 (W.D.Wis. Feb. 16, 2011) ("Arbitration Order"). Because the district...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases