No. 2011-1229.

673 F.3d 1361 (2012)

ERGO LICENSING, LLC and Uvo Holscher, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CAREFUSION 303, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

March 26, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James G. Goggin , Verrill Dana, LLP, of Portland, ME, argued for plaintiffs-appellants.

Stanley J. Panikowski , DLA Piper LLP (US), of San Diego, CA, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief was Kathryn Riley Grasso .

Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge NEWMAN.

MOORE, Circuit Judge.

Ergo Licensing, LLC and Dr. Uvo Hölscher (Ergo, collectively) accused Care-Fusion 303, Inc. (CareFusion) of infringing claims of U.S. Patent No. 5,507,412 ('412 patent) relating to an infusion system. In construing the claims, the district court held that the terms "control means" and "programmable control means" are indefinite. Because the district court correctly held that no corresponding structure is disclosed in the specification, we...

Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases