1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 673 F.3d
  5. 673 F.3d 728 (2012)
 

U.S. v. CONRAD

No. 10-2001.

673 F.3d 728 (2012)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David CONRAD, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided March 14, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph H. Thompson (argued), Attorney, Office of the United States Attorney, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Beau B. Brindley (argued), Attorney, Law Offices of Beau B. Brindley, Chicago, IL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before BAUER and TINDER, Circuit Judges, and MAGNUS-STINSON, District Judge.

MAGNUS-STINSON, District Judge.

If ordered, suppression of unconstitutionally obtained evidence can permit "[t]he criminal . . . to go free because the constable has blundered." People v. Defore, 242 N.Y. 13, 150 N.E. 585, 587 (1926) (Cardozo, J.). Given a blunder that the Government does not dispute here, Defendant David Conrad argues that the district court should have suppressed all the evidence of child pornography that was recovered following an illegal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases