1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 673 F.3d
  5. 673 F.3d 294 (2012)
 

RAY COMMUNICATIONS v. CLEAR CHANNEL COMMUNICATIONS

No. 11-1050.

673 F.3d 294 (2012)

RAY COMMUNICATIONS, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CLEAR CHANNEL COMMUNICATIONS, INCORPORATED; Clear Channel Broadcasting, Incorporated; Katz Media Group, Incorporated; Katz Communications, Incorporated, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Decided: March 8, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

ARGUED: Michael Steven Culver , Millen, White, Zelano & Branigan, PC, Arlington, Virginia, for Appellant. Bart Wescott Huffman , Cox Smith Matthews Incorporated, San Antonio, Texas, for Appellees. ON BRIEF: Marissa Helm , Cox Smith Matthews Incorporated, San Antonio, Texas, for Appellees.

Vacated and remanded by published opinion. Judge DAVIS wrote the opinion, in which Judge KING and Judge GREGORY joined.

OPINION

DAVIS, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiff-Appellant Ray Communications, Inc. ("RCI") filed this action alleging trademark infringement under Section 32(1) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1114(1); federal unfair competition under Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a); and unfair competition and deceptive trade practices under the North Carolina Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices Act ("UDTPA"), N.C. Gen.Stat. § 75-1.1, thereby...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases