U.S. v. HENZEL

No. 11-2293.

668 F.3d 972 (2012)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Samuel T. HENZEL, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided February 17, 2012.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brant Cook (argued), Attorney, Office of the United States Attorney, Indianapolis, IN, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Jack F. Crawford (argued), Attorney, Crawford & Devane, Indianapolis, IN, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before BAUER, POSNER and ROVNER, Circuit Judges.


BAUER, Circuit Judge.

Samuel T. Henzel pleaded guilty to traveling across state lines with the intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, 18 U.S.C. § 2423(b). He was given a prison sentence of 135 months, which the district court and the parties assumed to be above the applicable Guidelines range. On appeal, Henzel challenges only the reasonableness of that sentence, arguing that the district court did not give adequate reasons for the variance. We disagree...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases