1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 666 F.3d
  5. 666 F.3d 1081 (2012)
 

PALMER v. ILLINOIS FARMERS INS. CO.

Nos. 11-2061, 11-2064, 11-2065, 11-2067.

666 F.3d 1081 (2012)

Sharon K. PALMER, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Appellant, v. ILLINOIS FARMERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee. Sandra Kluessendorf, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Appellant, v. Progressive Preferred Insurance Company, Appellee. Michael Hara, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Appellant, v. USAA Casualty Insurance Company, Appellee. David Johnson, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Appellant, v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company, Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Filed: February 2, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ira Neil Richards , argued, Kenneth I. Trujillo , Jennifer Agnew , Gary M. Goldstein , Trujillo & Rodriguez, Philadelphia, PA, Garrett D. Blanchfield, Jr. , Brant D. Penney , Reinhardt & Wendorf, St. Paul, MN, Christopher P. Caputo , Joseph E. Mariotti , Caputo & Mariotti, P.C., Moosic, PA, John Jacobs , Bryan Kolton , Chicago, IL, for appellants.

Robert N. Feltoon , argued, Deborah J. Krabbendam , Francesco P. Trapani , Conrad O'Brien PC, Philadelphia, PA, Lewis A. Remele, Jr. , Christopher R. Morris , Bassford & Remele, PA, Minneapolis, MN, Charles N. Nauen , Eric C. Tostrud , Matthew R. Salzwedel , David W. Asp , Lockridge Grindal Nauen P.L.L.P., Minneapolis, MN, Mark A. Solheim , David C. Linder , Larson King LLP, St. Paul, MN, Thomas Fraser , Joseph J. Cassioppi , Fredrikson & Byron, P.A., Philadelphia, PA, for appellees.

Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

MURPHY, Circuit Judge.

Minnesota residents Sharon Palmer, Sandra Kluessendorf, Michael Hara, and David Johnson (insureds) filed class action complaints against their automobile insurers, Illinois Farmers Insurance Company, Progressive Preferred Insurance Company, USAA Casualty Insurance Company, and American Family Mutual Insurance Company respectively. They alleged 1) violations of a Minnesota statute requiring insurers to provide a discount for cars which have antitheft...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases