CAREY v. 24 HOUR FITNESS, USA, INC.

No. 10-20845.

669 F.3d 202 (2012)

John CAREY, Individually and On Behalf of Other Employees Similarly Situated, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 24 HOUR FITNESS, USA, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

January 25, 2012.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Trang Quoc Tran , Trial Atty. (argued), Tran Law Firm, L.L.P., Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Robert J. Carty, Jr. (argued), Kate Lesley Birenbaum , Seyfarth Shaw, L.L.P., Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before SMITH, PRADO and ELROD, Circuit Judges.


PRADO, Circuit Judge:

Appellant 24 Hour Fitness, USA, Inc. appeals the district court's denial of its motion to stay proceedings and compel arbitration of Appellee John Carey's claim. The district court held that the binding arbitration provision relied upon by 24 Hour Fitness is illusory because 24 Hour Fitness "retain[ed] the unilateral right to modify or terminate the arbitration provision" at any time. For the reasons stated below, we AFFIRM.

I. FACTUAL...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases