FARMERS & MERCHANTS MUTUAL TELEPHONE CO. v. F.C.C.

No. 10-1093.

668 F.3d 714 (2011)

FARMERS AND MERCHANTS MUTUAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF WAYLAND, IOWA, Petitioner v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and United States of America, Respondents Northern Valley Communications, LLC, et al., Intervenors.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided December 30, 2011.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John F. Cooney argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were James U. Troup , Tony S. Lee , and Christine McLaughlin.

Ross A. Buntrock argued the cause for intervener Northern Valley Communications, LLC. With him on the briefs was G. David Carter . Jonathan E. Canis and Stephanie A. Joyce entered appearances.

Joel Marcus , Counsel, Federal Communications Commission, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Austin C. Schlick , General Counsel, Peter Karanjia , Deputy General Counsel, and Richard K. Welch , Acting Associate General Counsel. Robert B. Nicholson and Robert J. Wiggers , Attorneys, U.S. Department of Justice, and Daniel M. Armstrong III , Associate General Counsel, Federal Communications Commission, entered appearances.

David H. Solomon argued the cause for intervenors Qwest Communications Company, LLC, et al. With him on the brief were Craig J. Brown , Russell P. Hanser , Robert B. McKenna , Charles W. McKee , Michael B. Fingerhut , Scott H. Angstreich , Gregory G. Rapawy , M. Robert Sutherland , Gary L. Phillips , Paul K. Mancini , Michael E. Glover , Karen Zacharia , and Christopher M. Miller . David L. Lawson and James P. Young entered appearances.

Opinion for the Court by Circuit Judge ROGERS.


ROGERS, Circuit Judge:

In the three challenged orders, the Federal Communications Commission addressed a "traffic pumping" (or access stimulation) scheme in which the holder of the filed tariff entered into contractual arrangements with conference calling companies and charged the interexchange carrier the tariff rate for providing switched access service. Interpreting the tariff to require switched access service to be provided to an end user, the Commission determined...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases