WATKINS v. SUNTRUST MORTG., INC.

No. 10-1915.

663 F.3d 232 (2011)

Edward B. WATKINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Decided: December 14, 2011.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

ARGUED: Henry Woods McLaughlin, III , Law Office of Henry McLaughlin, P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Mark C. Shuford , Kaufman & Canoles, P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Matthew B. Chmiel , Kaufman & Canoles, P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge NIEMEYER wrote the majority opinion, in which Judge DIAZ joined. Judge WYNN wrote a dissenting opinion.


OPINION

NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge:

The issue presented is whether a lender violates the Truth in Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1601 et seq. ("TILA"), in providing notice to a borrower who is refinancing his mortgage of the right to rescind the transaction, using a form of notice substantially similar to Model Form H-8 in the Appendix to Regulation Z, 12 C.F.R. pt. 226, rather than using Model Form H-9, which was designed for refinancing transactions.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases