1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 663 F.3d
  5. 663 F.3d 634 (2011)
 

U.S. v. BANSAL

Nos. 06-1370, 06-2535, 06-2536, 06-3043, 07-1525, 07-1526, 07-4618, 09-1827.

663 F.3d 634 (2011)

UNITED STATES of America, v. Akhil BANSAL, Appellant in Nos. 06-1370, 06-2535, 07-1525, and Frederick Mullinix, Appellant in Nos. 06-2536, 06-3043, 07-1526, 07-4618, 09-1827.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Filed: December 14, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Akhil Bansal , Schuylkill FCI, Minersville, PA, pro se.

Frederick Mullinix , Federal Prison Camp, Pensacola, FL, pro se.

Raymond S. Sussman (on brief), Law Office of Raymond S. Sussman, Brooklyn, NY, for Appellant Frederick Mullinix.

Zane David Memeger , Robert A. Zauzmer , Frank R. Costello , Office of the United States Attorney, Philadelphia, PA, for Appellee.

Before: SLOVITER, GREENAWAY, JR. and ALDISERT, Circuit Judges.

OPINION OF THE COURT

ALDISERT, Circuit Judge.

Akhil Bansal and Frederick Mullinix appeal from their jury convictions in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on a 42-count indictment alleging crimes arising from their multi-national, internet-based, controlled-substance-distribution scheme. They have, in our estimation, challenged every decision of the District Court, at almost every moment of the litigation before, during...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases