1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 657 F.3d
  5. 657 F.3d 1293 (2011)
 

MARKEM-IMAJE CORP. v. ZIPHER LTD.

No. 2010-1305.

657 F.3d 1293 (2011)

MARKEM-IMAJE CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ZIPHER LTD. and Videojet Technologies, Inc., Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

September 9, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kurt L. Glitzenstein , Fish & Richardson, P.C., of Boston, MA, argued for plaintiff-appellee. With him on the brief was Michael Clark Lynn .

Kara F. Stoll , Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellants. With her on the brief were J. Michael Jakes and Susan Y. Tull. Of counsel was Joyce Craig .

Opinion for the court filed PER CURIAM. Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge NEWMAN.

PER CURIAM.

Markem-Imaje Corp. sued Zipher Ltd. and Videojet Technologies, Inc. (together "Zipher") in the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire, requesting a declaratory judgment that Zipher's U.S. Patent No. 7,150,572 (the '572 patent) is not infringed by Markem. The district court granted summary judgment of noninfringement,1 and Zipher appeals. We conclude that the district court erred in construing a critical...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED
OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases