1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 656 F.3d
  5. 656 F.3d 1002 (2011)
 

CARRICO v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

No. 09-17151.

656 F.3d 1002 (2011)

Tim CARRICO, Plaintiff, and Small Property Owners of San Francisco Institute; Mary Figone, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed September 6, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Andrew M. Zacks and Paul F. Utrecht (argued), Zacks & Utrecht, P.C., San Francisco, CA, for the plaintiffs-appellants.

Tara M. Steeley , Deputy City Attorney, San Francisco, CA, for the defendant-appellee.

Before: JOHN T. NOONAN and N. RANDY SMITH, Circuit Judges, and FREDERIC BLOCK, District Judge.

OPINION

BLOCK, District Judge:

The Small Property Owners of San Francisco Institute ("SPOSFI") and Mary Figone appeal the district court's judgment rejecting their facial First Amendment and vagueness challenges to portions of "Proposition M," a popularly enacted amendment to the rent-stabilization ordinance of the City and County of San Francisco ("the City"). Because we conclude that both SPOSFI and Figone...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases