1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 656 F.3d
  5. 656 F.3d 467 (2011)
 

MICROMETL CORP. v. TRANZACT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

No. 10-3134.

656 F.3d 467 (2011)

MICROMETL CORP., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TRANZACT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided August 24, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert M. Frye , Mickey J. Lee (argued), Attorneys, Stewart & Irwin, Indianapolis, IN, Jill C. Taylor , Attorney, Ungaretti & Harris, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Ryan A. Mahoney (argued), Daniel C. Sullivan , Attorneys, Sullivan Hincks & Conway, Oak Brook, IL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before FLAUM, WOOD, and TINDER, Circuit Judges.

WOOD, Circuit Judge.

After Micrometl Corp. filed suit in state court against Tranzact Technologies, Inc., alleging overbillings in excess of $100,000, Tranzact removed to federal court. The parties are of diverse citizenship, and so jurisdiction appeared secure. Over a year and a half after the lawsuit commenced, however, Micrometl produced a document showing that its damages were really, so it seemed, less than $40,000. Tranzact believed that the document conclusively...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases