1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 651 F.3d
  5. 651 F.3d 764 (2011)
 

U.S. v. WRIGHT

Nos. 10-1249, 10-1956.

651 F.3d 764 (2011)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Augustus WRIGHT and Raymie Henderson, Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided July 12, 2011.

Rehearing Denied August 25, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Megan Cunniff Church (argued), Attorney, Office of the United States Attorney, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Kenneth N. Flaxman (argued), Attorney, Chicago, IL, for Defendant-Appellant in No. 10-1249.

Robert A. Habib (argued), Attorney, Stephen M. Komie, Attorney, Komie & Associates, Chicago, IL, for Defendant-Appellant in No. 10-1956.

Before BAUER, KANNE, and EVANS, Circuit Judges.

EVANS, Circuit Judge.

Augustus Wright and Raymie Henderson were convicted by separate juries of conspiring to engage in monetary transactions in criminally derived property, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956. Henderson was additionally convicted of engaging in a monetary transaction in criminally derived property, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1957. On appeal, Wright and Henderson ask us reverse their convictions and/or remand their cases for new trials on...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases