U.S. v. WITHAM

No. 10-1814.

648 F.3d 40 (2011)

UNITED STATES, Appellant, v. Wayne WITHAM, Defendant, Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

Decided June 8, 2011.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Seth R. Aframe , Assistant United States Attorney, John P. Kacavas , United States Attorney, and Michael T. McCormack , Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for appellant.

Wayne Witham , pro se.

Before LYNCH, Chief Judge, BOUDIN and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges.


LYNCH, Chief Judge.

This case raises a narrow but important question. In light of the Mandatory Victim Restitution Act of 1996 (MVRA), Pub.L. No. 104-132, §§ 201-211, may the United States meet its obligation to enforce an order of restitution to a private-party victim of a crime by use of the Federal Debt Collection Procedure Act (FDCPA), 28 U.S.C. §§ 3001-3308, including its garnishment procedure, § 3205?

In a decision that predated...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases