U.S. v. RUNYAN

No. 10-3400.

639 F.3d 382 (2011)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David Lee RUNYAN, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided May 2, 2011.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Emily Kathleen Kerkhof (argued), Attorney, Office of the United States Attorney, Hammond, IN, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Ashwin Cattamanchi (argued), Assistant Federal Public Defender, Indiana Federal Community Defenders, Inc., Hammond, IN, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before KANNE, ROVNER, and WOOD, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM.

David Runyan appeals his 63-month sentence for being a felon in possession of a firearm, see 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). He argues that the district court wrongly sentenced him to the high end of the Guidelines range without meaningfully considering his personal history and characteristics, see 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(1)— namely, the care he gave years ago to his then-terminally ill father. We affirm.

In the midst of a drinking...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases