1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 635 F.3d
  5. 635 F.3d 613 (2011)
 

SCHMIDT v. CREEDON

Nos. 09-2051, 10-1633.

635 F.3d 613 (2011)

Michael C. SCHMIDT, Appellant v. James P. CREEDON, Connie A. Tennis, Richard A. Shaffer, Gregory A. Green.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Submitted under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) November 2, 2010.

Filed: March 29, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nathan C. Pringle, Jr., Esquire , (Argued), Harrisburg, PA, for Appellant.

Thomas W. Corbett, Jr., Esquire , Attorney General, Howard G. Hopkirk, Esquire , (Argued), Senior Deputy Attorney General, Calvin R. Coons, Esquire , Senior Deputy Attorney General, John G. Knorr, III, Esquire , Chief Deputy Attorney General, Office of Attorney General, Harrisburg, PA, for Appellees.

Before: SCIRICA, STAPLETON and ROTH, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

ROTH, Circuit Judge:

This appeal involves the application of the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause to the suspension of policemen in Pennsylvania. Michael Schmidt, an officer in Pennsylvania's Capitol Police, claims that appellees, senior officers of the Capitol Police and officials of Pennsylvania's Department of General Services, violated his due process rights when they failed to provide him a hearing before suspending

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases