1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 637 F.3d
  5. 637 F.3d 1314 (2011)
 

INNOVENTION TOYS, LLC v. MGA ENTERTAINMENT, INC.

No. 2010-1290.

637 F.3d 1314 (2011)

INNOVENTION TOYS, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MGA ENTERTAINMENT, INC., Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., and Toys "R" Us, Inc., Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

March 21, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James C. Otteson , Agility IP Law, of East Palo Alto, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellee.

Michael A. Nicodema , Greenberg Traurig, LLP, of Florham Park, NJ, argued for defendants-appellants. With him on the brief were Mark R. Galis and Kevin J. O'Shea , of Chicago, IL.

Before RADER, Chief Judge, LOURIE, Circuit Judge, and WHYTE, District Judge.

LOURIE, Circuit Judge.

MGA Entertainment, Inc.; Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.; and Toys "R" Us, Inc. (collectively, "MGA") appeal from the summary judgment decision of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana that the asserted claims of U.S. Patent 7,264,242 ("the '242 patent") were infringed and were not invalid for obviousness. Innovention Toys, LLC v. MGA Entm't, Inc., 

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases