U.S. v. AVILA

No. 09-2681.

634 F.3d 958 (2011)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Martin AVILA, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided March 7, 2011.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Barry D. Glickman (argued), Attorney, Office of the United States Attorney, Indianapolis, IN, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Andrew L. Franklin (argued), Attorney, Milwaukee, WI, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before KANNE, EVANS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM.

The issue in this successive appeal is whether the district court on remand could correct a previously undetected factual error in its drug-quantity finding that had favored the defendant, Martin Avila. During the first appeal, Avila successfully argued that the district court sentenced him using an offense level that did not correspond to the original drug-quantity finding, so we remanded for resentencing. See United States v. Avila, 

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases