1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 639 F.3d
  5. 639 F.3d 1329 (2011)
 

HOLOGIC, INC. v. SENORX, INC.

No. 2010-1235.

639 F.3d 1329 (2011)

HOLOGIC, INC., Cytyc Corporation, and Hologic L.P., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SENORX, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied April 26, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Matthew M. Wolf , Howrey, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for the plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the brief was John E. Nilsson .

Kannon K. Shanmugam , Williams & Connolly, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for the defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were Bruce R. Genderson , Aaron P. Maurer and Adam D. Harber .

Before NEWMAN, FRIEDMAN, and LOURIE, Circuit Judges.

LOURIE, Circuit Judge.

Hologic, Inc., Cytyc Corp., and Hologic L.P. (collectively "Hologic") appeal from the decision of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California granting summary judgment of invalidity of claim 1 of U.S. Patent 6,482,142 (the "'142 patent"), Hologic, Inc. v. SenoRx, Inc., 08-CV-0133 (N.D.Cal. Oct. 30, 2009) ("Summary Judgment Op."), and from the judgment following a jury verdict of invalidity of claim...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases