TRUSTMARK INS. CO. v. JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INS. CO.

No. 09-3682.

631 F.3d 869 (2011)

TRUSTMARK INSURANCE CO., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY (U.S.A.), Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided January 31, 2011.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Everett J. Cygal (argued), Roger Pascal , Attorneys, Schiff Hardin LLP, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

John C. Kocoras (argued), Attorney, McDermott, Will & Emery, Chicago, IL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge, and CUDAHY and ROVNER, Circuit Judges.


EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge.

Two insurance companies agreed in 1997 that Trustmark would reinsure some risks underwritten by John Hancock. The details of the parties' multiple contracts are unimportant for our purposes. It is enough to say that the insurers disagree about the meaning of "London Market Retrocessional Excess of Loss business", which Trustmark need not reinsure. The parties submitted their dispute to arbitration...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases