IN RE UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC. SHAREHOLDER

No. 09-2900.

631 F.3d 913 (2011)

In re UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE LITIGATION. S. Michael Scheeringa, Objector-Appellant, Jan Brandin, In the right of and for the benefit of UnitedHealth Group, Inc.; Jacksonville Police & Fire Pension Fund; Louisiana Municipal Police Employees' Retirement System; Louisiana Sheriffs' Pension & Relief Fund; Public Employees' Retirement System of Mississippi; St. Paul Teachers' Retirement Fund; Association; Fire & Police Pension Association of Colorado; Public Employees' Retirement System of Ohio; State Teachers' Retirement System of Ohio; Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust Funds; Plaintiffs' Coordinating Committee, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. William W. McGuire, M.D.; Stephen J. Hemsley; William C. Ballard, Jr.; James A. Johnson; Thomas H. Kean; Douglas W. Leatherdale; Mary O. Mundinger; Robert L. Ryan; William G. Spears; Gail R. Wilensky; United-Health Group, Inc.; James G. Carlson; Arnold H. Kaplan; David P. Koppe; David J. Lubben; Thomas P. McDonough; Jeannine M. Rivet; R. Channing Wheeler; Travers H. Wills; Richard T. Burke; Donna E. Shalala; Robert J. Sheehy, Defendant-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Filed: January 26, 2011.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward Frank Siegel , argued, Edward C. Cochran , on the brief, Cleveland, OH, for appellant.

Karl L. Cambronne , argued, Minneapolis, MN, Jack L. Chestnut , Karin Ennette Peterson , Ann E. Walther , Jeffrey D. Bores , Brian F. Rice , Minneapolis, MN, Edward F. Haber , Michelle H. Blauner , Boston, MA, Jay W. Eisenhofer , Alessandra Phillips , Wilmington, DE, Michael J. Barry , Adam Wierzbowski, Beata Gocyk-Farber , C. Chad Johnson , New York, NY, on the brief, for appellee.

Before SMITH, BEAM, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.


BEAM, Circuit Judge.

Objector-Appellant S. Michael Scheeringa challenges the district court's order requiring UnitedHealth Group, Inc., (United-Health) to reimburse derivative counsel for online-research expenses that counsel incurred while litigating a shareholder-derivative suit that ended in a large recovery pursuant to a settlement agreement. In response, Appellees filed a motion to dismiss Scheeringa's appeal, arguing that he lacks standing under Federal Rule...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases