GOSAIN v. STATE BANK OF INDIA

Nos. 10-711-cv (L)., 10-2783-cv (CON)

RAJIV SHAH GOSAIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE BANK OF INDIA, NEW YORK BRANCH as successor to Bank of India Flushing Branch; STATE BANK OF INDIA (MUMBAI); TEXPLAS INDIA PRIVATE LTD., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

January 21, 2011.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

ADAM FRANCOIS WATKINS , Watkins Bradley & Chen LLP, New York, New York ( Elias N. Sakalis , Sakalis & Associates, Riverdale, New York, on the brief). For Plaintiff-Appellant.

RICHARD S. LAST , Foreht Last Landau & Katz LLP, New York, New York. For Defendants-Appellees.

Present: AMALYA L. KEARSE, RALPH K. WINTER, PETER W. HALL, Circuit Judges.


SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED, that the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED in part and VACATED and REMANDED in part. The order of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Rajiv Shah Gosain appeals principally from the district court's judgment dismissing his claims against State Bank of India, New York Branch ("New York Branch), as successor to State Bank...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases