ARLINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC. v. BRIDGEPORT FITTINGS

No. 2010-1025.

632 F.3d 1246 (2011)

ARLINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BRIDGEPORT FITTINGS, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

January 20, 2011.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kathryn L. Clune , Crowell & Moring, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With her on the brief was Lucy Grace D. Noyola . Of counsel on the brief were Carter G. Phillips and Eric A. Shumsky , of Sidley Austin LLP, of Washington, DC.

Deanne E. Maynard , Morrison & Foerster LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. With her on the brief were Mark E. Ungerman , Seth M. Galanter and Marc A. Hearron . Of counsel on the brief was Alan M. Anderson , Briggs and Morgan, P.A., of Minneapolis, MN.

Opinion for the court filed by Chief Judge, RADER. Opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part filed by Circuit Judge, LOURIE.


RADER, Chief Judge.

Two concomitant litigations between Arlington Industries, Inc. ("Arlington") and Bridgeport Fittings, Inc. ("Bridgeport"), both from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, produced different constructions of the same claim term from Arlington's U.S. Patent No. 5,266,050 ("the '050 patent"). In the earlier filed case, the court construed the term "spring metal adaptor" to mean "an adaptor made of spring metal....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases