TRANSMISSION AGENCY OF NORTHERN CALIF. v. F.E.R.C.

Nos. 09-1213, 09-1216, 09-1217, 09-1245, 09-1246, 09-1247.

628 F.3d 538 (2010)

TRANSMISSION AGENCY OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, Petitioner v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, Respondent City of Redding, California, et al., Intervenors.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided December 10, 2010.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael Postar and Harvey L. Reiter argued the cause for petitioners. With them on the briefs were Bhaveeta K. Mody , Jon R. Stickman , Abigail Briggerman , Sean M. Neal , John McCaffrey , Peter J. Scanlon , and Jason T. Gray.   Lisa S. Gast , Matthew R. Rudolphi , and Marie D. Zosa entered appearances.

Joseph B. Nelson , Deborah A. Swanstrom , and Lodie D. White were on the briefs for intervenors Imperial Irrigation District and City of Los Angeles Department of Water and Power in support of petitioners.

Samuel Soopper , Attorney, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Thomas R. Sheets , General Counsel, and Robert H. Solomon , Solicitor.

Daniel J. Shonkwiler argued the cause for intervenors California Independent System Operator Corporation and Southern California Edison Company in support of respondent. With him on the brief were Nancy J. Saracino , Roger E. Collanton , Jennifer R. Hasbrouck , Erin K. Moore , and Mark R. Huffman.   Erin K. Moore and Mark D. Patrizio entered appearances.

Opinion for the Court by Circuit Judge ROGERS.


ROGERS, Circuit Judge:

Various municipalities1 petition for review of two Federal Energy Regulatory Commission orders conditionally approving the California Independent System Operator ("CAISO")'s proposal to create an Integrated Balancing Authority Area ("IBAA") by combining the Sacramento Municipal Utility District ("SMUD") and the Turlock Irrigation District ("Turlock") for the purpose of pricing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases