1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 626 F.3d
  5. 626 F.3d 280 (2010)
 

McCARTHY v. CITY OF CLEVELAND

No. 09-4149.

626 F.3d 280 (2010)

Daniel McCARTHY; Colleen Carroll, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF CLEVELAND, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided and Filed: November 9, 2010.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

ARGUED: Thomas A. Muzilla , The Muzilla Law Firm, LLC, Cleveland, Ohio, for Appellants. Gary Scott Singletary , City of Cleveland, Department of Law, Cleveland, Ohio, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Thomas A. Muzilla , The Muzilla Law Firm, LLC, Cleveland, Ohio, for Appellants. Michael F. Cosgrove , Jennifer Meyer , City of Cleveland, Department of Law, Cleveland, Ohio, for Appellee.

MAYS, D.J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which COLE, J., joined. McKEAGUE, J. (pp. 287-89), delivered a separate concurring opinion.

OPINION

SAMUEL H. MAYS, JR., District Judge.

Plaintiffs Daniel McCarthy and Colleen Carroll appeal the judgment of the district court dismissing their action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiffs allege that the City of Cleveland's decision to enforce its traffic camera ordinance against drivers who lease their cars constituted an unconstitutional taking of private property without just compensation because the ordinance originally did not provide...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases