1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 624 F.3d
  5. 624 F.3d 498 (2010)
 

U.S. v. MATHUR

No. 09-1704.

624 F.3d 498 (2010)

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Amit MATHUR, Defendant, Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

Decided November 3, 2010.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Vivian Shevitz , with whom Jane Simkin Smith was on brief, for appellant.

John A. Capin , Assistant United States Attorney, with whom Carmen M. Ortiz , United States Attorney, was on brief, for appellee.

Before BOUDIN, RIPPLE and SELYA, Circuit Judges.

SELYA, Circuit Judge.

Defendant-appellant Amit Mathur wants a new trial or, at least, resentencing based on the government's tardy disclosure of Brady material. See Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 87, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963). Concluding, as we do, that the district court acted appropriately in addressing the delayed disclosure, we affirm.

I. BACKGROUND...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases