1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 625 F.3d
  5. 625 F.3d 75 (2010)
 

INVISTA S.À.R.L. v. RHODIA, S.A.

No. 09-2514.

625 F.3d 75 (2010)

INVISTA S.À.R.L.; Invista Technologies, S.à.r.l.; Invista North America S.à.r.l. v. RHODIA, S.A., Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Opinion filed: October 25, 2010.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jonathan L. Greenblatt, Esq. (Argued), Neil Koslowe, Esq. , Christopher Ryan, Esq. , Sean Arthurs, Esq. , Shearman & Sterling LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellant.

Kathleen M. Sullivan, Esq. (Argued), Michael B. Carlinsky, Esq. , Daniel L. Brockett, Esq., Sanford I. Weisburst, Esq. , Quinn Emmanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges, LLP, New York, NY, Jack B. Blumenfeld, Esq. , Rodger D. Smith II, Esq. , Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnel LLP, Wilmington, DE, for Appellees.

Before: McKEE, Chief Judge, HARDIMAN, Circuit Judge, and RUFE, District Judge.

OPINION

McKEE, Chief Judge.

Rhodia, S.A., appeals the district court's denial of the motion it filed pursuant to Section 3 of the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. § 3, ("FAA"), in which Rhodia asked the district court to dismiss or stay an action filed against Rhodia by Invista S.à.r.l., Invista Technologies, S.à.r.l. and Invista North America S.à.r.l. ("INVISTA").1 For the reasons set forth below, we will...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases