XODUS v. WACKENHUT CORP.

No. 09-3082.

619 F.3d 683 (2010)

Lord Osunfarian XODUS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WACKENHUT CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided August 27, 2010.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Elizabeth Hubbard , Attorney, Hubbard & O'Connor, Kamran A. Memon , Attorney (argued), Law Offices of Kamran A. Memon, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Richard B. Lapp , Attorney (argued), Seyfarth Shaw LLP, Chicago, IL, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before BAUER, ROVNER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.


BAUER, Circuit Judge.

Lord Osunfarian Xodus appeals the district court's judgment that Wackenhut did not engage in religious discrimination when it refused to hire him on account of his dreadlocked hairstyle. Specifically, Xodus disputes the court's conclusion that he never brought his religious beliefs to Wackenhut's attention. We affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

A dreadlock is a "ropelike strand of hair formed by matting or braiding." Merriam Webster's Collegiate...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases