CONOCOPHILLIPS CO. v. U.S. E.P.A.

No. 06-60662.

612 F.3d 822 (2010)

CONOCOPHILLIPS CO.; Anadarko Petroleum Corp.; Surfrider Foundation; Massachusetts Public Interest Protection Research Group; Soundkeeper, Inc.; Delaware Riverkeeper Network; American Littoral Society; Raritan Baykeeper, Inc., dba NY/NJ Baykeeper; Save the Bay-People for Narragansett Bay; Friends of Casco Bay; Santa Monica Baykeeper, Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY; Stephen L. Johnson, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency, in His Official Capacity as Administrator of the United States EPA, Respondent, American Petroleum Institute, Respondent-Intervenor.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

As Revised August 6, 2010.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jackson Battle (argued), Kurt Howard Kuhn, Brown McCarroll, L.L.P., Austin, TX, for ConocoPhillips Co. and Anadarko Petroleum Corp.

Jessica O'Donnell, Rochelle Leigh Russell, Trial Atty. (argued), U.S. Dept. of Justice, Environment & Natural Resources, Scott Fulton, EPA, Washington, DC, for U.S. EPA.

Russell Scott Frye (argued), FryeLaw, P.L.L.C., Washington, DC, for Cooling Water Intake Structure Coalition.

Elise Zoli, Kevin Paul Martin, Goodwin Proctor, L.L.P., Boston, MA, Michael Brunston Wallace, Wise, Carter, Child & Caraway, P.A., Jackson, MS, for Entergy Corp.

Reed W. Super (argued), Super Law Group, L.L.C., New York City, for Surfrider Foundation and Environment Massachusetts.

Philip Kent Correll, New York City, Edward Lloyd, Morning Side Heights Legal Services, New York City, Deborah A. Sivas, Stanford Law School, Legal Clinics, Stanford, CA, for Surfrider Foundation.

Frederic P. Andes, Barnes & Thornburg, L.L.P., Chicago, IL, for American Petroleum Institute.

Charles Craig Caldart, Nat. Environmental Law Ctr., Seattle, WA, Joshua R. Kratka, Nat. Environmental Law Ctr., Boston, MA, for Environment Massachusetts.

Before JOLLY, WIENER, BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.


WIENER, Circuit Judge:

Before us are various consolidated challenges to a Final Rule (the "Rule") promulgated by the Environmental Protection Agency (the "EPA") pursuant to § 316(b) of the Clean Water Act (the "Act" or the "CWA"). The Rule regulates the use of cooling water intake structures ("CWIS") for both existing and new offshore oil and gas extraction facilities. Originally, the environmental Petitioners (collectively "Riverkeeper") challenged the Rule...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases