U.S. v. PAIGE

No. 09-13067 Non-Argument Calendar.

604 F.3d 1268 (2010)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert D. PAIGE, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

April 27, 2010.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Adam Scott Tanenbaum, Fed. Pub. Def., Tampa, FL, for Paige.

Peter J. Sholl, Tampa, FL, for U.S.

Before BLACK, PRYOR and FAY, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM:

Robert D. Paige appeals his convictions for permitting his minor child to engage in sexually explicit conduct for the purpose of producing child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2251(b); and possession of child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(5)(B). He also appeals his 180-month total sentence. Paige argues that § 2251(b) is facially unconstitutional, because Congress exceeded its Commerce Clause authority in enacting...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases