1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 596 F.3d
  5. 596 F.3d 1343 (2010)
 

COMAPER CORP. v. ANTEC, INC.

Nos. 2009-1248, 2009-1249.

596 F.3d 1343 (2010)

COMAPER CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Cross Appellant, v. ANTEC, INC., Defendant-Appellant, and Best Buy Co., Inc. and Micro Electronics, Inc., Defendants.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

March 1, 2010.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen J. Driscoll, Saul Ewing, LLP, of Philadelphia, PA, argued for plaintiff-cross appellant.

Robert P. Andris II, Ropers Majeski, Kohn & Bentley, of Redwood City, CA, argued for defendant-appellant. With him on the brief was Lael D. Andara.

Before RADER, GAJARSA, and DYK, Circuit Judges.

DYK, Circuit Judge.

Antec, Inc. ("Antec") appeals from a final judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. A jury found that Antec had willfully infringed claims 1, 2, 7, 12, and 13 of U.S. Patent No. 5,955,955 ("the '955 patent"), owned by Comaper Corp. ("Comaper"), and that independent claims 1 and 12 of the patent were not invalid as obvious. However, the jury also found that dependent claims 2, 7, and 13 were obvious...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases