U.S. v. STEPHENS

No. 09-3706.

594 F.3d 1033 (2010)

UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. David STEPHENS, Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Filed: February 17, 2010.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark Tremmel, AUSA, argued, of Sioux City, IA, for appellant.

Michael L. Smart, AFPD, argued, of Sioux City, IA, for appellee.

Before RILEY, SMITH, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.


RILEY, Circuit Judge.

After a grand jury returned an indictment alleging David Stephens received and transported child pornography, the government asked the district court to impose a curfew and electronic monitoring as conditions of Stephens' pretrial release. A curfew and electronic monitoring are required under § 216 of the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006, Pub.L. 109-248, 120 Stat. 587 (2006) (Adam Walsh Act) (codified at 18 U.S.C. §...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases