1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 591 F.3d
  5. 591 F.3d 491 (2010)
 

U.S. v. BENSON

Nos. 08-1131, 08-1358.

591 F.3d 491 (2010)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Nathaniel BENSON (08-1131) and Cynthia Shank (08-1358), Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided and Filed: January 12, 2010.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

ARGUED: Brian R. Laxton, Mertens, Laxton and Clement, PLLC, East Lansing, Michigan, Kenneth P. Tableman, Kenneth P. Tableman, P.C., Grand Rapids, Michigan, for Appellants. John C. Bruha, Assistant United States Attorney, Grand Rapids, Michigan, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Brian R. Laxton, Scott A. Mertens, Mertens, Laxton and Clement, PLLC, East Lansing, Michigan, Kenneth P. Tableman, Kenneth P. Tableman, P.C., Grand Rapids, Michigan, for Appellants. John C. Bruha, Assistant United States Attorney, Grand Rapids, Michigan, for Appellee.

Before: SILER, GIBBONS, and GRIFFIN, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

SILER, Circuit Judge.

Defendants Nathaniel Benson and Cynthia Shank appeal their convictions and sentences based on their connection with a drug conspiracy. For the reasons that follow, we AFFIRM the judgments of the district court.

BACKGROUND

I. Offense Conduct

In early 1997, Shank (nee Valdez) began a relationship with Alex Humphry. Within the course of a few months, she moved in with Humphry and discovered that he was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases