U.S. v. ROGERS

No. 08-1516.

587 F.3d 816 (2009)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Stephen L. ROGERS, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided November 18, 2009.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven Dollear (argued), Office of the United States Attorney, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Heather L. Winslow (argued), Chicago, IL, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before CUDAHY, FLAUM and WOOD, Circuit Judges.


WOOD, Circuit Judge.

In 1994, Congress altered the longstanding ban on propensity evidence in criminal trials so that, in trials for sexual assault, similar conduct is admissible "for its bearing on any matter to which it is relevant." FED.R.EVID. 413. This appeal asks how this modification affects a district court's analysis under FED.R.EVID. 403, the catch-all provision excluding evidence that is relevant under Rule 401...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases