1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 585 F.3d
  5. 585 F.3d 355 (2009)
 

U.S. v. ROSENBERG

No. 08-3373.

585 F.3d 355 (2009)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Candice ROSENBERG, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided October 26, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul W. Connell, Attorney (argued), Office of the United States Attorney, Madison, WI, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Richard H. Parsons, Attorney, Peoria, IL, Paul F.X. Schwartz, Attorney, Madison, WI, A. Brian Threlkeld, Attorney (argued), Office of the Federal Public Defender, Urbana, IL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge, and BAUER and EVANS, Circuit Judges.

EVANS, Circuit Judge.

This appeal, like many others we see, involves a squabble over what constitutes properly considered "relevant conduct" under the federal sentencing guidelines. Candice Rosenberg, a 60-year-old nurse practitioner working in the area around Rhinelander (Wisconsin), was charged in an 82-count indictment with prescribing a variety of controlled substances—including oxycontin, vicodin, and fentanyl—to nine people, each of whom she knew...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases