1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 582 F.3d
  5. 582 F.3d 686 (2009)
 

U.S. v. HAYNES

Nos. 08-1466, 08-1608, 08-1616, 08-1617.

582 F.3d 686 (2009)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Darek HAYNES, Broderick Jones, Eural Black, and Brent Terry, Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided September 17, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Matthew B. Burke, Attorney (argued), John R. Lausch, Jr., Attorney, Office of the United States Attorney, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Katherine Elizabeth Agonis, Attorney (argued), Mayer Brown LLP, Allan A. Ackerman, Attorney (argued), Chicago, IL, Marc M. Barnett, Attorney (argued), Barnett & Nagel, Bridgeview, IL, Thomas L. Shriner, Jr., Attorney, Foley & Lardner, Milwaukee, WI, for Defendants-Appellants.

Before POSNER, MANION, and TINDER, Circuit Judges.

TINDER, Circuit Judge.

Crime is a risky business. One of the risks is that you will get caught. That happened to Darek Haynes, Broderick Jones, Eural Black, and Brent Terry. They were charged with a drug conspiracy, a robbery and extortion conspiracy, and related offenses. Haynes, Jones, and Black also were charged with a racketeering conspiracy. Haynes and Jones pled guilty. Black and Terry were tried by a jury and convicted. These defendants appeal, raising several...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases