U.S. v. HICKEY

Nos. 05-10004, 06-10206.

580 F.3d 922 (2009)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John A. HICKEY, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John A. Hickey, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed September 2, 2009.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ezekiel E. Cortez and Erin J. Lindquist, San Diego, CA, for the appellant.

Vijay Shanker, United States Department of Justice Criminal Division, Appellate Section, Washington, D.C., for the appellee.

Opinion by Judge MCKEOWN; Concurrence by Judge REINHARDT.


McKEOWN, Circuit Judge:

This appeal stems from a massive fraud scheme that resulted in protracted civil and criminal proceedings spanning more than ten years. John A. Hickey ("Hickey") and his business partner, Mamie Tang ("Tang"), induced over 700 individuals to invest approximately $20 million in two real estate development funds. Their plan was to purchase land in Northern California, prepare the land for residential development...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases