U.S. v. RINGGOLD

No. 06-10492.

571 F.3d 948 (2009)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Arnold RINGGOLD, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed July 7, 2009.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Barry J. Portman, Federal Public Defender, and Jerome E. Matthews (argued), Assistant Federal Public Defender, Oakland, CA, for the defendant-appellant.

Joseph P. Russoniello, United States Attorney, Barbara J. Valliere, Assistant United States Attorney, and W.S. Wilson Leung (argued), Assistant United States Attorney, San Francisco, CA, for the plaintiff-appellee.

Before: J. CLIFFORD WALLACE, EDWARD LEAVY and SIDNEY R. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.


THOMAS, Circuit Judge:

This appeal concerns the question whether, after United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), a district court abuses its discretion by declining to consider the disparity between a recommended Guidelines sentence and the maximum sentence a defendant would receive if convicted of the same conduct in state court. Under the circumstances...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases