KAMM v. ITEX CORP.

No. 07-35079.

568 F.3d 752 (2009)

Bruce KAMM, an individual; Invision Ltd., a New York corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. ITEX CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed June 15, 2009.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James M. Shore, Stoel Rives LLP, Seattle, WA, Stephen A. Redshaw, Stoel Rives LLP, Portland, OR, for the appellant.

Nicholle Y. Winters (argued), Thomas R. Johnson and Christopher L. Garrett (on the brief), Perkins Coie LLP, Portland, OR, for the appellees.

Before: W. FLETCHER and RAYMOND C. FISHER, Circuit Judges, and CHARLES R. BREYER, District Judge.


WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:

Bruce Kamm and Invision Ltd. (collectively "Plaintiffs") sued ITEX Corporation ("ITEX") on a contract in Oregon state court. ITEX filed a notice to remove the suit to federal district court based on diversity of citizenship. Thirty-one days later, Plaintiffs moved to remand to state court based on a forum selection clause in the contract. The district court granted Plaintiffs' motion to remand.

ITEX appeals, contending that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases