HUMMEL v. ROSEMEYER

No. 06-2711.

564 F.3d 290 (2009)

Edward V. HUMMEL, Appellant v. Frederick ROSEMEYER, Superintendent; Esquire * Tom Corbett Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. * {Substituted pursuant to F.R.A.P. 43(c)}.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Filed April 29, 2009.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

H. David Rothman (Argued), Pittsburgh, PA, Attorney for Appellant.

Leanne R. Nedza (Argued), William A. Shaw, Jr., Office of District Attorney, Clearfield, PA, Attorneys for Appellees.

Before: SLOVITER, STAPLETON and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.


OPINION OF THE COURT

SLOVITER, Circuit Judge.

We are once again faced with the need to determine whether the state court determination that counsel representing a petitioner in a state court criminal action provided competent counsel as required by the Sixth Amendment survives our review under 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

Edward Hummel, who is missing a portion of his brain after a self-inflicted gunshot wound, sought a writ of habeas corpus, contending...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases