1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 560 F.3d
  5. 560 F.3d 903 (2009)
 

CENTER FOR BIO. DIV. v. MARINA POINT DEV. CO.

Nos. 06-56193, 07-55243, 07-56574.

560 F.3d 903 (2009)

CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY; Friends of Fawnskin, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. MARINA POINT DEVELOPMENT CO.; Okon Development Co.; Oko Investments, Inc.; Northshore Development Associates, L.P., e/s/a North Shore Development Associates, L.P.; Site Design Associates, Inc.; Ken Discenza; VDLP Marina Point; Venwest Marina Point, Inc., e/s/a Venture West Inc.; Irving Okovita, Defendants-Appellants. Center for Biological Diversity; Friends of Fawnskin, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Marina Point Development Co.; Okon Development Co.; Oko Investments, Inc.; Northshore Development Associates, L.P., e/s/a North Shore Development Associates, L.P.; Site Design Associates, Inc.; Ken Discenza; VDLP Marina Point; Venwest Marina Point, Inc., e/s/a Venture West Inc.; Irving Okovita, Defendants-Appellants. Center for Biological Diversity; Friends of Fawnskin, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Marina Point Development Co.; Okon Development Co.; Oko Investments, Inc.; Northshore Development Associates, L.P., e/s/a North Shore Development Associates, L.P.; Site Design Associates, Inc.; Ken Discenza; VDLP Marina Point; Venwest Marina Point, Inc., e/s/a Venture West Inc.; Irving Okovita, Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed August 6, 2008.

Amended March 27, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert D. Crockett, Latham & Watkins LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for the defendants-appellants.

Bernice Conn, Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi L.L.P., Los Angeles, CA, for the plaintiffs-appellees.

Opinion by Judge FERNANDEZ; Concurrence by Judge RYMER; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge KLEINFELD.

ORDER AMENDING OPINION AND DISMISSING PETITION FOR REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC AND AMENDED OPINION

ORDER

Upon reconsideration of the attorney fee issues, we amend our Opinion filed on August 6, 2008, and commencing at slip op. 99191, 535 F.3d 1026, as follows:

(1) We revoke the last sentence of the introductory paragraph, which appears at slip op. 9925 (535 F.3d at 1029) and substitute...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases