BALL AEROSOL AND SPEC. CONTAINER v. LIMITED BRANDS

No. 2008-1333.

555 F.3d 984 (2009)

BALL AEROSOL AND SPECIALTY CONTAINER, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. LIMITED BRANDS, INC., Bath & Body Works, Inc., Henri Bendel, Inc., and Bath & Body Works, Inc. (doing business as The White Barn Candle Co.), Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

February 9, 2009.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

McPherson D. Moore, Polster, Lieder, Woodruff & Lucchesi, L.C., of St. Louis, MO, argued for plaintiff-appellee. With him on the brief were Douglas D. Churovich and William B. Cunningham, Jr.

Gregory A. Castanias, Jones Day, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellant. With him on the brief were Luke, A. Sobota and Marc S. Blackman, Jones Day, of Chicago, IL; and John F. Ward, David M. Hill and Michael J. Zinna, Ward & Olivo, of New York, NY.

Before LOURIE, CLEVENGER, and LINN, Circuit Judges.


LOURIE, Circuit Judge.

Limited Brands, Inc., Bath & Body Works, Inc., Henri Bendel, Inc., and Bath & Body Works, Inc. doing business as The White Barn Candle Co. (collectively, "Limited") appeal from the final judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois granting summary judgment of validity and infringement of U.S. Patent 6,457,969 ("the '969 patent"), awarding damages, and denying a motion for reconsideration. See...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases